Šodienas jautājumu un atbilžu sesija mums priecājas par SuperUser - Stack Exchange dalību, kas ir kopienas vadīta Q & A tīmekļa vietņu grupa.
Jautājums
SuperUser lasītājs Disa ir interesanti par loopback IP:
I know that both are loopback IPs, but they have another ip mask.
What’s the difference between them? Can they be used interchangeably?
=========================================================================== IPv4 routes =========================================================================== Active routes: Destination Mask Gateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.6 26 […] 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 On-link 127.0.0.1 306 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 127.0.0.1 306
Kāda veida informāciju mēs varam izkļūt no šīs tabulas?
Atbilde
Divus SuperUser atbalstītājus uzlēca, lai palīdzētu atrisināt noslēpumu. Pirmkārt, Mmmc piedāvā šo īsu pārskatu:
No. You cannot use them both. And they are not both loopback adresses.
127.0.0.1
ir loopback adrese
127.0.0.2
ir loopback adrese
127.0.0.3
ir loopback adrese un tā tālāk
127.0.0.0
ir tīkla adrese. Kopā ar 255.0.0.0 masku tas sniedz mājienu, ka viss A adrešu skaits sākas ar
127.*.*.*
satur loopback adreses.
Tad YLearn piedāvā plašāku pārskatu par nosaukumu konvencijām kopumā un par to, kā domāt par tiem:
What is shown in the screenshot is a routing table from a computer. The routing table is just a “roadmap” that tells a computer/router where to go to get to other devices on the network.
In some ways this is similar to how we navigate in real life.
The first column provides the list of known destinations (where can I go) and the second column indicates how specific the destination (I can go to Canada or I can go to Uncle John’s house in Canada). Without getting into great detail, the “higher” the mask value, the more specific the destination. So a value of 0.0.0.0 covers going to any device and a value of 255.255.255.255 specifies an individual device.
The third column specifies where traffic should go next to get to the destination (if you are going to Canada, you need to start by getting on Main Street) and the fourth column indicates which path out of the device should be used to get to the destination (from home you may only have your driveway but from the Walmart parking lot you may have several “exits” to choose from).
Finally, the metric gives the computer a way to choose the best path if there are multiple routes to the destination (you can go out either the north or east exit from the parking lot to get to Canada, but the east one is a faster).
So to answer the original question, no you can’t use 127.0.0.0 and 127.0.0.1 interchangeably. The difference shown here is that there exists two routes – a general route to any device using 127.x.y.z and a very specific route to host 127.0.0.1 (which is in 127.0.0.0), both of which use the 127.0.0.1 interface
Vai kaut ko pievienot paskaidrojumam? Skatieties komentāros. Vēlaties lasīt citas atbildes no citiem tehnoloģiju savvy Stack Exchange lietotājiem? Šeit skatiet pilnu diskusiju pavedienu.
