Vai failu sistēma ir tikai pakešu ķekars? (Izskaidroti failu sistēmas)

Satura rādītājs:

Vai failu sistēma ir tikai pakešu ķekars? (Izskaidroti failu sistēmas)
Vai failu sistēma ir tikai pakešu ķekars? (Izskaidroti failu sistēmas)

Video: Vai failu sistēma ir tikai pakešu ķekars? (Izskaidroti failu sistēmas)

Video: Vai failu sistēma ir tikai pakešu ķekars? (Izskaidroti failu sistēmas)
Video: How to change Firefox Tab size (width & height) & Show all tabs on one view, make bars smaller - YouTube 2024, Novembris
Anonim
Virspusē jūsu operētājsistēmas failu sistēma var tikai izskatīties kā liela mapju kaudze, taču, protams, tam ir daudz vairāk. Lasiet tālāk, kad mēs pētām, kas atrodas zem failu sistēmas virsmas.
Virspusē jūsu operētājsistēmas failu sistēma var tikai izskatīties kā liela mapju kaudze, taču, protams, tam ir daudz vairāk. Lasiet tālāk, kad mēs pētām, kas atrodas zem failu sistēmas virsmas.

Šodienas jautājumu un atbilžu sesija mums priecājas par SuperUser - Stack Exchange dalību, kas ir kopienas vadīta Q & A tīmekļa vietņu grupa.

Jautājums

SuperUser lasītājs P_Q ir ziņkārīgs par failu sistēmām, viņš raksta:

I have used Windows since childhood, and when I hear the phrase “Windows files system” I think of directories (folders) within directories, a folder called SYSTEM, a folder called PROGRAM FILES, etc. Is this what the system is? Just the layout of the folders?

And then I recently started using Linux, and my reference book says in the Linux filesystem everything starts at root and branches off from there. How is that really different from Windows? I mean, it seems the Linux system and the Windows system are just two ways of setting up a directory tree. Is this what file system means?

Vai tas ir vienkāršs, lai failu sistēma uzņemtu visprecīzāko tā apraksta veidu? Izrauksim mazliet dziļāk.

Atbilde

SuperUser atbalstītājs Tom Wijsman piedāvā ieskatu par faila sistēmu struktūru gan Windows, gan Linux operētājsistēmās. Viņš raksta:

Just the layout of the folders?

Sounds too good to be true…

Let’s take the FAT32 file system as an example. I can install Windows XP on it, but I can also use it on a memory card. On a memory card, you don’t have those folders that you sum up.

So… Don’t confuse the directory layout of a family of operating systems with a file system.

Is this what a file system means?

No… It refers to the underlying bits and bytes that make your directory structure work.

The underlying bits and bytes? Show me FAT32!

Let’s look at what FAT32 looks like, it has:

  • Some header sectors in the beginning, like Volume ID and Reserved Sectors
  • Two File Allocation Tables, allowing us to figure out where our files are.
  • Clusters containing all our directory and file data.
  • Some very small unused space that we can’t use.
A FAT table consists of a lot of entries that look like this, allowing us to determine where the directory or file is stored in the clusters space, as well as some attributes and size.
A FAT table consists of a lot of entries that look like this, allowing us to determine where the directory or file is stored in the clusters space, as well as some attributes and size.

A directory entry would point to a list of directory/file entries…

In the clusters space, we can now travel our clusters to find the data we need. A cluster essentially contains data and information where the next fragments are
In the clusters space, we can now travel our clusters to find the data we need. A cluster essentially contains data and information where the next fragments are
Image
Image

Do other file systems differ? Show me NTFS!

I’m going to show you an image so you can notice the differences, the rest is homework for the reader: More information can be found on this blog archive or Google.

The main idea is that NTFS is a huge improvement over FAT32 that is more robust/efficient. Having a better idea of (un)used space by using a bitmap to further help against fragmentation. And so on…

Image
Image

What about the file systems on Linux? Show me ext2/3!

The idea is that ext2/ext3 use super blocks and inodes; this allows for soft and hardlinks, directories that are files, files with multiple names and so on. The main gist is abstracting away to allow the file system to be capable of doing more meta-ish stuff…

Image
Image

Lai iegūtu plašāku lasīšanas informāciju par failu sistēmām, noteikti izlasiet tālāk minētos rakstus:

  • HTG paskaidro: Linux direktoriju struktūra ir paskaidrota
  • HTG paskaidro: Kurai Linux failu sistēmai vajadzētu izvēlēties?
  • Kāda failu sistēma man vajadzētu izmantot manam USB diskam?

Vai kaut ko pievienot paskaidrojumam? Skatieties komentāros. Vēlaties lasīt citas atbildes no citiem tehnoloģiju savvy Stack Exchange lietotājiem? Šeit skatiet pilnu diskusiju pavedienu.

Ieteicams: