Kāpēc Zip var saspiest vienfailus labāk nekā vairākus failus ar tādu pašu saturu?

Satura rādītājs:

Kāpēc Zip var saspiest vienfailus labāk nekā vairākus failus ar tādu pašu saturu?
Kāpēc Zip var saspiest vienfailus labāk nekā vairākus failus ar tādu pašu saturu?

Video: Kāpēc Zip var saspiest vienfailus labāk nekā vairākus failus ar tādu pašu saturu?

Video: Kāpēc Zip var saspiest vienfailus labāk nekā vairākus failus ar tādu pašu saturu?
Video: КАК СКАЧАТЬ МУЗЫКУ НА iPhone?! Работает 100% - YouTube 2024, Aprīlis
Anonim
Spēja saspiest mūsu failus, lai tos būtu vieglāk koplietot un / vai transportēt, var padarīt mūsu elektronisko dzīvi daudz vieglāku, taču dažkārt mēs varam saskatīt nepāra vai negaidītus lieluma rezultātus pēc to saspiešanas. Kāpēc ir tā, ka? Šodienas SuperUser Q & A ziņā ir atbildes uz sajaukt lasītāja jautājumiem.
Spēja saspiest mūsu failus, lai tos būtu vieglāk koplietot un / vai transportēt, var padarīt mūsu elektronisko dzīvi daudz vieglāku, taču dažkārt mēs varam saskatīt nepāra vai negaidītus lieluma rezultātus pēc to saspiešanas. Kāpēc ir tā, ka? Šodienas SuperUser Q & A ziņā ir atbildes uz sajaukt lasītāja jautājumiem.

Šodienas jautājumu un atbilžu sesija mums priecājas par SuperUser - Stack Exchange dalību, kas ir kopienas vadīta Q & A tīmekļa vietņu grupa.

Foto pieklājīgi no Jean-Etienne Minh-Duy Poirrier (Flickr).

Jautājums

SuperUser lasītājs sixtyfootersdude vēlas uzzināt, kāpēc zip spēj saspiest atsevišķus failus labāk nekā vairākus failus ar tāda paša veida saturu:

Suppose that I have 10,000 XML files and want to send them to a friend. Before sending them, I would like to compress them.

Method 1: Do Not Compress Them

Results:

Image
Image

Method 2: Zip Every File Separately and Send Him 10,000 Zipped XML Files

Command:

Results:
Results:
Image
Image

Method 3: Create a Single Zip File Containing All 10,000 XML Files

Command:

Results:
Results:
Image
Image

Method 4: Concatenate the Files Into a Single File and Zip It

Command:

Results:
Results:
Image
Image

Questions

  • Why do I get such dramatically better results when I am just zipping a single file?
  • I was expecting to get drastically better results using method 3 rather than method 2, but I do not. Why is this?
  • Is this behaviour specific to zip? If I tried using Gzip, would I get different results?

Additional Info

Image
Image

Meta Data

One of the answers given suggests that the difference is the system meta data that is stored in the zip file. I do not believe that this can be the case. To test it, I did the following:

The resulting zip file is 1.4 MB. This means that there is still approximately ten MB of unexplained space.
The resulting zip file is 1.4 MB. This means that there is still approximately ten MB of unexplained space.

Kāpēc zip spēj saspiest atsevišķus failus labāk nekā vairāki faili ar tāda paša veida saturu?

Atbilde

SuperUser atbalstītāji Alan Shutko un Aganju ir atbilde mums. Pirmkārt, Alan Shutko:

Zip compression is based on repetitive patterns in the data to be compressed, and the compression gets better the longer the file is, as more and longer patterns can be found and used.

Simplified, if you compress one file, the dictionary that maps (short) codes to (longer) patterns is necessarily contained in each resulting zip file; if you zip one long file, the dictionary is ‘reused’ and grows even more effective across all content.

If your files are even a bit similar (as text always is), reuse of the ‘dictionary’ becomes very efficient and the result is a much smaller total zip file.

Seko Aganju atbilde:

In zip, each file is compressed separately. The opposite is solid compression, that is, files are compressed together. 7-zip and Rar use solid compression by default. Gzip and Bzip2 cannot compress multiple files, so Tar is used first, having the same effect as solid compression.

As xml files have similar structure (and probably similar content), if the files are compressed together then the compression will be higher.

For example, if a file contains the string “” and the compressor has already found that string in another file, it will replace it with a small pointer to the previous match. If the compressor does not use solid compression, the first occurrence of the string in the file will be recorded as a literal, which is larger.

Vai kaut ko pievienot paskaidrojumam? Skatieties komentāros. Vēlaties lasīt citas atbildes no citiem tehnoloģiju savvy Stack Exchange lietotājiem? Šeit skatiet pilnu diskusiju pavedienu.

Ieteicams: